C-666 de 2014
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo
✓Claimant Nahum Alberto Jaramillo Gomez·Respondent Ley 1183 De 2008, Articulo 1 Parcial
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Inhibición para pronunciarse de fondo respecto de la expresión “urbanos” contenida en la norma demandada
- Ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra la expresión “urbanos” contenida en el artículo 1º de la Ley 1183 de 2008, por medio de la cual se asignan funciones a los Notarios.
El demandante alega que la expresión acusada vulnera el preámbulo y el artículo 13 de la Constitución.
La Corte se INHIBIÓ de emitir un fallo de fondo, al constatar la ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda, por no concurrir los criterios de claridad, especificidad y suficiencia. <br> <br>
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 1183/08. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE:
- Declararse INHIBIDA para pronunciarse de fondo respecto de la expresion: "urbanos", contenida en el primer inciso del articulo 1 de la Ley 1183 de 2008, por ineptitud sustancial de la demanda.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.