JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 1, 2006Full bench

C-607 de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Guillermo Otalora Lozano

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Norma Del Código Civil
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Codigo civil articulo 2543 (parcial).

Prescripcion de la accion de los mercaderes proveedores y artesanos.

El accionante considera que mantener vigente el termino "criados" en la norma demandada se incurre en un evidente desconocimiento de la cosa juzgada constitucional contemplada en el articulo 243 de la carta politica debido a que en la sentencia c-1235 de 2005 la corte declaro la inexequibilidad de esa expresion.

Inhibicion por carencia actual de objeto.

El termino de prescripcion contenido en el articulo 2543 del codigo civil fue sustituido por la prevision general del articulo 488 del codigo sustantivo del trabajo y por decision expresa del legislador el referido inciso del articulo del codigo civil se encuentra derogado y no esta produciendo efectos.

Inhibida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 84/73. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2543Ley 84/73DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 2543Ley 57/87DECLINED TO RULE
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declararse INHIBIDA para emitir pronunciamiento de fondo respecto de la expresión "criados" contenida en el inciso
  2. segundo. de artículo 2543 del Código Civil, por las razones expuestas en la parte considerativa de esta Sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.