JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 7, 1995Full bench

C-584 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Fernando Afanador Nuñez

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 100/93. Art. 128. Inc. 3 Parcial. Dec. 813/94. Art. 6 Lit. A).. Seguridad Social. Seleccion De Regimen De Los Servidores Publicos. Exequible. Sent. Inhibitoria.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Instituto De Seguros Sociales
  • Naturaleza
  • Afiliación imperativa
Seguridad Social
  • Servicio público de carácter obligatorio
Sistema General De Pensiones
  • Selección del régimen
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 100/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 128Ley 100/93 «Los servidores públicos que no estén afiliados a una caja, fondo o entidad de previsión o seguridad social»UPHELD
Art. 6Decreto 813/94DECLINED TO RULE
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el inciso
  4. tercero. del artículo 128 de la Ley 100 de 1993 en los apartes acusados, en el entendido de que éste rige en relación con los servidores públicos que no hubiesen manifestado su voluntad de continuar afiliados a la caja, fondo o entidad de previsión a la cual se hallaban vinculados, de conformidad con lo previsto en el inciso 2o. de la Ley 100 de 1993.
  5. Segundo. INHIBIRSE para fallar acerca de la inconstitucionalidad del aparte III) del literal a) del artículo 6o. del Decreto 813 de 1994 por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  6. Notifíquese, publíquese, cópiese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.