JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 6, 1997Full bench

C-569 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Beatriz Garzon De Quiroz

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 335/96. Arts. 2 Y 16 Parcial. Ley De Television. Ver. C-350 Y 445/97.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 14/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 14/91ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
On the entire provisionLey 182/95ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 16Ley 335/96ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 16Ley 336/96ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 16Ley 336/96ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 2Ley 335/96ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
6 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-350 de 1997, en relacion con el articulo 2deg de la ley 335 de 1996.
  2. Segundo. Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-350 de 1997, en relacion con la expresion "determinacion de la programacion" contenida en el inciso
  3. primero. del articulo del articulo 16 de la ley 335 de 1996.
  4. Tercero. Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-350 de 1997, en relacion con el paragrafo 1deg del articulo 16 de la ley 336 de 1996.
  5. Cuarto. Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-445 de 1997, en relacion con la expresion "previo visto bueno del Ministerio de Comunicaciones", contenida en el inciso
  6. segundo. del paragrafo 2o del articulo 16 de la ley 336 de 1996.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.