JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 4, 2007Full bench

C-505 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Ramon Esteban Laborde Rubio

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Ley 715 De 2001
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 715 de 2001 articulo 98.

Distribucion de los recursos del sistema general de participaciones.

Corregimientos departamentales.para el demandante la norma acusada resulta contraria al regimen territorial del estado colombiano y al esquema de descentralizacion y desconcentracion previsto en los articulos 1 2 13 40-1 40-2 286 287 288 311 316 y 330 de la constitucion.inhibicion de la corte por ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda.

Falta de certeza del cargo de inconstitucionalidad.

Inhibida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 715/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 151Ley 715/01DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 151Acto_legislativo 01/01DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 151Acto_legislativo 01/01DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 98Ley 715/01DECLINED TO RULE
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA para fallar el presente proceso, de conformidad con los argumentos presentados en la parte motiva de esta sentencia, a propósito de los defectos sustantivos de los cargos de inconstitucionalidad formulados por el demandante.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.