JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 2, 1997Full bench

C-490 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Ramiro Rodriguez Lopez

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 336/96. Arts.12 Parcial 31 Parag; 46 Lit E) 48 Lit E) Y 63. Estatuto Nacional De Transporte. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Codigo Nacional De Transito Terrestre
  • Revisión técnico mecánica vehicular
Impuesto De Timbre
  • Supresión para vehículos de servicio público
Recursos Humanos
  • Carácter técnico del término
6 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 336/96. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 12Ley 336/96UPHELD
Art. 31Ley 336/96UPHELD
Art. 46Ley 336/96UPHELD
Art. 48Ley 336/96 «literal e»UPHELD
Art. 63Ley 336/96UPHELD
5 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLÁRANSE EXEQUIBLES los apartes acusados de los artículos 12, 31, 48 y 63 de la ley 336 de 1996, con la aclaración de que el literal e) del artículo 48 del mencionado Estatuto, se refiere al literal d) del artículo 46 y no al literal d) del artículo 49.
  2. Segundo. DECLÁRASE EXEQUIBLE el literal e) del artículo 46 de la ley 336 de 1996, con la advertencia de que, dentro de la escala prevista por el artículo 46, las sanciones deberán ser razonables y proporcionales a la gravedad de la infracción.
  3. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.