JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 9, 2001Full bench

C-478 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Luis Enrique Olivera Petro

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Derogación Tácita De Norma Y No Efectos Jurídicos
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Derogación tácita de norma y no efectos jurídicos
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 141 de 1994.

Art. 41.

Parag.

Fondo nacional de regalias comision nacional de regalias derecho del estado a recibir regalias por la explotacion de recursos naturales no renovables.

Distribucion y compensacion monetaria derivada de la explotacion de niquel

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 141/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 41Ley 141/94DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. INHIBIRSE para emitir pronunciamiento de fondo por carencia actual del objeto con respecto al paragrafo del articulo 41 de la ley 141 de 1994, "Por la cual se crean el Fondo Nacional de Regalias, la Comision Nacional de Regalias, se regula el derecho del Estado a percibir regalias por la explotacion de recursos naturales no renovables, se establecen las reglas para su liquidacion y distribucion y se dictan otras disposiciones".
  2. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.