JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 21, 2012Full bench

C-457 de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Luis Ricardo Gomez Pinto·Respondent Acto Legislativo 03 De 2011

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzagada Constitucional En Sostenibilidad Fiscal. Aplicación Del Principio In Dubio Pro Legislatoris
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acto Legislativo 3 De 2011
  • Existencia de cosa juzgada respecto del presunto vicio de forma relacionado con su adopción
Sostenibilidad Fiscal
  • Cosa juzgada constitucional
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Demanda de Inconstitucionalidad contra el Acto Legislativo 03 de 2011, Por el cual se establece el principio de sostenibilidad fiscal.

Se alega en la demanda que se incurrió en un vicio de procedimiento en el trámite legislativo que precedió a la expedición del Acto Legislativo acusado.

La Corte constató la existencia de cosa juzgada constitucional y en tal sentido decide ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-332/12.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Acto_legislativo 03/11. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionActo_legislativo 03/11ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
On the entire provisionActo_legislativo 03/11ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-332 del 9 de mayo de 2012, que declaro EXEQUIBLE el Acto Legislativo 3 de 2011.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.