JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 10, 1999Full bench

C-456 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez

✓Claimant Felix Hoyos Lemus

✓
Topic · hard data
Normas De Carrera Adminsitrativa. Estarse A Lo Resuelto En Sentencia C-370/99 Que Declaró La Inexequibilidad De Frase "y Los Reglamentos"
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra la Ley 443 de 1998, “por la cual se expiden normas sobre carrera administrativa y se dictan otras disposiciones”, art. 37, literal k).

El actor señaló que viola los artículos 113,125 y 150, numeral 23 de la Constitución Política.

La Sala Concluyó que la Corporación se había pronunciado previamente sobre la expresión demanda, por ende, se configuró la cosa juzgada constitucional.

Por lo anterior, dispuso estarse a lo resuelto en Sentencia C-370/99 que declaró inexequible la expresión “y los reglamentos”, consignada en el literal k) del artículo 37 de la Ley 443 de 1998.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 443/98. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 37Ley 443/98ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Estarse a lo resuelto en la Sentencia C-370 del 26 de mayo de 1999 que declaró INEXEQUIBLE la expresión "y los reglamentos", consignada en el literal k) del artículo 37 de la Ley 443 de 1998.
  4. Cópiese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.