JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 7, 1993Full bench

C-429 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Eudoro Vallejo

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 2158/48. Art. 29 Inc 2 Y 3 Parciales Y Art 37 Parcial. Nombramiento De Curador Ad-Litem. Proposicion Y Sustanc. De Incidentes. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2158/48. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 29Decreto 2158/48 «y no dictará sentencia mientras no se haya cumplido el emplazamiento", y, "y procederá al emplazamiento como queda previsto en el inciso anterior»UPHELD
Art. 3Decreto 2158/48UPHELD
Art. 37Decreto 2158/48 «Los incidentes sólo podrán proponerse en la primera audiencia de trámite»UPHELD
On the entire provisionDecreto 4133/48UPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E LV E :
  3. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLES las frases: "y no dictará sentencia mientras no se haya cumplido el emplazamiento" (inciso 2o.), y, "y procederá al emplazamiento como queda previsto en el inciso anterior" (inciso 3o.), del artículo 29 del Decreto 2158 de 1948, adoptado como legislación permanente por el Decreto 4133 de 1948.
  4. Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la frase: "Los incidentes sólo podrán proponerse en la primera audiencia de trámite" del artículo 37 del Decreto No. 2158 de 1948, adoptado como legislación permanente por el Decreto No. 4133 de 1948.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.