JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 25, 2001Full bench

C-411 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Alfonso Camerano Fuentes

✓
Topic · hard data
Sala De Casacion Penal De La Corte Suprema De Justicia. Competencia Contra Generales, Almirantes Y Magistrados De Tribunales Y Sus Equivalencias
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Suprema De Justicia
  • Facultad legislativa para nuevas competencias
Fuero Penal Militar
  • Integral
  • Interpretación restrictiva
  • Excepción constitucional no extensible por legislador
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Competencia en fuero penal militar
Fuero Legal
  • Asignación de competencias
  • Juzgamiento de fiscales militares
  • Sistema dual
Justicia Penal Ordinaria
  • Delito por miembro de fuerza pública sin relación con el servicio
Norma General De La Constitucion
  • Excepción no extensible por legislador
8 topics · 12 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 522 de 1999.

Arts. 234 num. 3.

Codigo penal militar.

Facultad del legislador para conferir nuevas competencias a la corte suprema de justicia.

Fuero constitucional para generales y almirantes de la fuerza publica.

Estese c-361 de 2001.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 522/99. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 234Ley 522/99ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. ESTESE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-361 de 2001, que declaro EXEQUIBLE el numeral 3deg del articulo 234, salvo la expresion "y fiscales ante esa corporacion", que se declaro INEXEQUIBLE.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
Partial dissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.