JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 30, 2012Full bench

C-396 de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Jose Gregorio Hernandez Galindo·Respondent Decreto Ley 3565 De 2011, Articulo 2 (Parcial)

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Facultades Extraordinarias Al Ejecutivo Para Modificar Normas Relacionadas Con Periodos De Los Directores Generales De Corporaciones Autonomas Regionales
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

<br>Demanda de Inconstitucionalidad contra el artículo 2º parcial del Decreto Ley 3565 de 2011, por el cual se modifican parcialmente la Ley 99 de 1993 y la Ley 1263 de 2008.

Para el actor, el precepto impugnado desconoce lo establecido en los artículos 3, 121 y 150, numerales 1, 7 y 10 de la Constitución Política.

A su juicio, el Gobierno Nacional excedió el uso de las facultades extraordinarias conferidas mediante el literal d) del artículo 18 de la Ley 1444 de 2011.

La Corte constató la existencia de cosa juzgada constitucional y en tal sentido decidió ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-366/12 que declaró inexequible el artículo 2º del Decreto Ley 3565 de 2011. <br>

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 3565/11. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2Decreto 3565/11ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-366 de 2012, que declaró INEXEQUIBLE el artículo 2º del Decreto Ley 3565 de 2011.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.