JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 27, 2009Full bench

C-380 de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Paulina Gomez Gonzalez

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Inhabilidad Intemporal Para Participar En Concurso Notarial. Procedencia Sólo Por Condena Penal, Disciplinaria O Administrativa Por Conductas Graves Lesivas Del Patrimonio O Por Faltas Como Notario
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto-ley 960 de 1970, “por el cual se expide el estatuto del notariado”, articulo 167. <br>la acusacion se cierne sobre violacion de los articulos 13, 25, 26, 29 y 40 numeral 7 de la constitucion politica. <br>la corte declaro la existencia de cosa juzgada constitucional en la materia, y en consecuencia, resolvio estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia c-177 de 2009, que definio la inexequibilidad del articulo demandado. <br>

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 960/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 167Decreto 960/70ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-177 de 2009, que declaró INEXEQUIBLE el artículo 167 del Decreto Ley 960 de 1970.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.