JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 8, 1998Full bench

C-338 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Yolanda Obando M

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 201/95. Art. 175 Parcial. Incompatibilidades De Cargos De La Procuraduria Y La Defensoria Del Pueblo. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incompatibilidades En Cargos Y Empleos De Procuraduria Y Defensoria
  • Gestión en nombre propio y ajeno ante entidades públicas
  • Ejercicio de la abogacía o de cualquier otra profesión
Inhabilidades E Incompatibilidades
  • Facultad legislativa para establecerlas dentro de criterios de razonabilidad y proporcionalidad
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 201/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 175Ley 201/95 «literal b, la expresión "con la gestión en nombre propio o ajeno ...»UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE, en los terminos de esta sentencia, la expresion "Con la gestion en nombre propio o ajeno ante las entidades publicas", contenida en el literal b) del articulo 175 de la Ley 201 de 1995.
  4. Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLE, en los terminos de esta sentencia, la expresion "... y el ejercicio de la abogacia o de cualquiera otra profesion u oficio", contenida en el literal e) del articulo 175 de la Ley 201 de 1995.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.