JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 7, 2002Full bench

C-335 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓
Topic · hard data
Control De Constitucionalidad Del Protocolo De Enmienda Al Tratado De Cooperacion Amazonica
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Region Amazonica
  • Alta significación de la diversidad biológica
  • Importancia ecológica especial
Tratado De Cooperacion Amazonica
  • Aumento del poder de gestión
  • Finalidad
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 690 de 2001.

Protocolo de enmienda al tratado de cooperacion amazonica.

Suscripcion.

Tramite en el congreso de la republica.

Analisis material.

Importancia ecologica especial de la region amazonica.

Disposiciones especificas.

Exequibles.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 690/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. PRIMERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el "Protocolo de Enmienda al Tratado de Cooperacion Amazonica", hecho en Caracas el dia 14 de Diciembre de 1998.
  4. SEGUNDO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la Ley 690 del 17 de Septiembre de 2001, por medio de la cual se aprueba dicho protocolo de enmienda.
  5. TERCERO. Enviar copia de esta sentencia al Presidente de la Republica y al Ministro de Relaciones Exteriores para los efectos pertinentes a que alude el articulo 241-10 de la Constitucion Politica.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.