JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 3, 2007Full bench

C-312 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Jhonny Alexander Ortiz Hernandez Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Derechos De Extranjeros En Organizaciones Sindicales
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Asociacion Sindical De Extranjero
  • No vulneración por norma que prohíbe que junta directiva sindical esté conformada en su mayoría por personas extranjeras
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Codigo sustantivo del trabajo articulo 388 inciso 2 modificado por el articulo 10 de la ley 584 de 2000.

Condiciones para los miembros de la junta directiva.los demandantes afirman que el aparte demandado es contrario a la constitucion por el trato diferenciado entre los colombianos por nacimiento y adopcion y los extranjeros que residen en colombia y viola los articulos 39 53 y 100 de la carta.cosa juzgada constitucional.estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia c-311 de 2007

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 584/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 10Ley 584/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Estarse a lo resuelto en la Sentencia C-311 de 2007, mediante la cual se declaro inexequible la expresion "En ningun caso la junta directiva podra estar conformada en su mayoria por personas extranjeras", contenida en el inciso
  2. segundo. del articulo 388 del Codigo Sustantivo del Trabajo, tal como fue modificado por el articulo 10 de la Ley 584 de 2000.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.