JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 13, 1998Full bench

C-200 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Clara Stella Ramos Sarmiento

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 335/96. Art. 17 Inc. 2. Concesionarios De Espacios De Television. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Contrato De Concesion De Espacios De Television
  • Terminación unilateral del concesionario no vulnera interés general
  • Derecho a la igualdad
  • Terminación unilateral del concesionario no siempre causa perjuicios
  • Terminación unilateral del concesionario sirve al interés general
Comision Nacional De Television
  • Actividad es regulada por el legislador
Principio De Economia En Control Y Gestion De Television
  • Se concreta en uso eficiente del personal y los recursos
Concesion De Espacios De Television
  • Interés general coincide con interés particular
Principio De Eficacia
  • Estado es responsable por la prestación de servicios públicos
5 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 14/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declarase EXEQUIBLE el inciso
  2. segundo. del articulo 17 de la Ley 335 de 1996, en el entendido de que la facultad que otorga a los concesionarios no constituye una excepcion al principio de que debe repararse el dano causado, cuando se ha incurrido en alguna de las hipotesis que conforme a nuestro ordenamiento dan lugar a la reparacion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.