JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 25, 2000Full bench

C-1438 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Maria Andrea Nieto Romero

✓
Topic · hard data
Decreto 1421 De 1993. Art. 27. Regimen Especial Para El Distrito Capital De Bogota. Requisitos Para Ser Elegido Concejal. Fallo Inhibitorio. Competencia Del Consejo De Estado. Inhibida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia sobre decreto gubernamental
Estatuto Organico De Bogota
  • Competencia de la Corte Constitucional
  • Rango y categoría de ley
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Conflictos de competencia entre distintas jurisdicciones
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1421/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 27Decreto 1421/93DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA para resolver sobre la demanda instaurada contra el articulo 27 del Decreto 1421 de 1993 con fundamento de lo expuesto en la parte motiva de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.