JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 19, 1997Full bench

C-132 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 165/97. Disposiciones Sobre Reduccion Del Gasto Publico En Materia De Contratos De Asesoria Y Consultoria Viajes Innales Etc. Emergencia. Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inconstitucionalidad Por Consecuencia En Declaracion De Emergencia
  • Reducción gasto público por contratos de asesoría
Inexequibilidad Declaracion De Conmocion Interior
  • Pérdida de vigencia de decretos expedidos
  • Sentencia inhibitoria sobre decretos expedidos
Inexequibilidad Declaracion De Emergencia
  • Decisión inhibitoria sobre decretos legislativos posteriores
  • Producción efectos fallos de decretos legislativos
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 165/97. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 165/97STRUCK DOWN
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declárase INEXEQUIBLE el Decreto No. 165 del 23 de enero de 1997, "por el cual se dictan disposiciones sobre reducción del gasto público en materia de contratos de asesoría y consultoría, viajes internacionales, publicidad oficial y se dictan otras disposiciones.
  4. Segundo. Esta providencia surte efectos a partir de su notificación en los términos del artículo 16 del Decreto 2067 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentJosé Gregorio Hernández GalindoDissentCarlos Gaviria Díaz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.