JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 29, 2001Full bench

C-1261 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Campo Elias Cruz Bermudez

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Presupuesto De Gastos O Ley De Apropiaciones
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Presupuesto de gastos o ley de apropiaciones
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 628 de 2000.

Art. 2 aparte.

Presupuesto de rentas y recursos de capital.

Ley de apropiaciones para el año 2001.

Presupuesto de gastos o ley de apropiaciones.

Poder adquisitivo de los salarios de los servidores publicos.

Cosa juzgada constitucional.

Estese a lo resuelto en c-1064/01

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 628/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2Ley 628/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-1064 de octubre 11 de 2001, que declaro exequible, con condicionamiento, el articulo 2 de la ley 628 de 2000.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.