JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 27, 1996Full bench

C-124 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Katherine Alexandra Cruz Faraco

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 2400/68. Art. 29 Inc. 2. No Reintegro Al Servicio Oficial De Pensionados. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2400/68. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 29Decreto 2400/68UPHELD
On the entire provisionDecreto 3074/68UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. administrando justicia
  2. EN NOMBRE DEL PUEBLO
  3. Y
  4. POR MANDATO DE LA CONSTITUCION,
  5. R E S U E L V E :
  6. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el inciso
  7. segundo. del artículo 29 del Decreto-Ley 2400 de 1968, subrogado por el artículo 1o. del Decreto 3074 de 1968.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.