JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 4, 2001Full bench

C-1054 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Doris Castellanos Rojas Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Juez De Instruccion Penal Militar. Delitos De Conocimiento De La Justicia Penal Militar
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Fuero Militar
  • Investigación y acusación de carácter excepcional
Juez De Instruccion Penal Militar
  • Delitos de conocimiento de la Justicia Penal Militar
  • Competencia
  • Competencia excepcional
  • Funcionario de instrucción
Fiscalia General De La Nacion
  • Investigación e instrucción de delitos
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 522 de 1999.

Arts. 263 num. 3 y 264.

Codigo penal militar.

Funcionarios de instruccion penal militar.

Competencia.

Fuero militar.

Fiscalia general de la nacion.

Funcion.

Delitos cometidos por miembros de la fuerza publica en servicio activo y en relacion con el mismo servicio

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 522/99. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 263Ley 522/99UPHELD
Art. 264Ley 522/99UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLES los artículos 263 numeral 3º y 264 de la Ley 522 de 1999.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.