A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
✓Claimant Andres Delgado Ortega
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Negar por cuanto se pretende reabrir debate jurídico
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-688/16.
El memorialista aduce que la precitada providencia adolece de un defecto fáctico y de uno procedimental y que además omitió pronunciarse respecto de la totalidad de los elementos planteados en la demanda.
A pesar de NEGAR la nulidad invocada, se exhorta al Juzgado Dieciocho Laboral de Bogotá, para que dé trámite expedito al proceso ordinario declarativo instaurado por la accionante.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. NEGAR LA NULIDAD de la Sentencia T-688 del 2 de diciembre de 2016, proferida por la Sala Primera de Revisión de la Corte Constitucional.
- Segundo. EXHORTAR al Juzgado Dieciocho Laboral de Bogotá para que dé trámite expedito al proceso 11001310501820160034500, por lo dicho en esta providencia.
- Comuníquese,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.