JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 5, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Amanda Carolina Ceballos Martinez Juez Administrativo De Descongestion Del Circuito·Respondent Direccion Ejecutiva De La Administracion Judicial

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Nariño Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Y Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Mocoa Sala Unica De Decision.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia a prevención
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Temas a tratar: Competencia a prevención, Respeto de la elección del accionante.

Se ordena remitir expediente al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Nariño Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria para que tramite y adopte decisión de fondo

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. DEJAR SIN EFECTOS el auto del 15 de diciembre de 2014 proferido por la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Narino, dentro del expediente ICC-2190.
  2. SEGUNDO. REMITIR a la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Narino el expediente ICC-2190, para que, de manera inmediata, tramite y adopte la decision de fondo a que haya lugar, dentro de la accion de tutela formulada por Amanda Carolina Ceballos Martinez contra la Direccion Ejecutiva de la Administracion Judicial.
  3. TERCERO. ORDENAR que, por Secretaria General, se comunique la decision adoptada en esta providencia a las partes y a la Sala Unica de Decision del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Mocoa.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Reporting justice
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
Magistrado
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
✓
María Victoria Calle Correa
Presidente
✓
Mauricio González Cuervo
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 0cited by 3 →A. 326/15T-334/21 — Accion De Tutela Para Controvertir Decisiones Judiciales Que Han Reconocido Y Reliquidado Pensiones Con Palmario Abuso Del Derecho-Procedenc · cited 17 timesT-334/212021T-615/16 — Accion De Tutela Contra Providencia Judicial. Improcedencia Por Cuanto No Hay Desconocimiento De Precedente Para Establecer El Ibl. · cited 16 timesT-615/162016T-034/18 — Accion De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Improcedencia Por Existir Otro Medio De Defensa Judicial Y No Existir Perjuicio Irremediabl · cited 8 timesT-034/182018
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by3

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.