JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Gustavo Aponte Riveros Jefe De La Oficina De Bonos Pensionales Del Ministerio De Hacienda Y Credito Publico

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaracion De La Sentencia T-445/07 En La Que La Sala Segunda De Revision Considera Que Dicha Solicitud Tiene Varias Finalidades Todas Ajenas A La Figura De La Aclaracion De Sentencias Como La De Reabrir El Debate Planteado En La Sentencia, Resolver Una Consulta Sobre Vigencia Y Aplicacion De Normas Legales, Resolver Una Controversia Administrativa Y Prevenir La Eventual Apertura De Un Incidente De Desacato. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia para aclarar sentencias que profiere
Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia por apartarse de las finalidades
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de aclaración formulada por el Jefe de la Oficina de Bonos Pensionales del Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público, Gustavo Aponte Riveros.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR al Jefe de la Oficina de Bonos Pensionales del Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público, Gustavo Aponte Riveros, que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.