A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
✓Claimant Jorge Armando Otalora Gomez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Negar por improcedente por ausencia de ambigüedades, confusión o dudas
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Temas a tratar: Procedencia excepcional de la aclaración de sentencias de la Corte Constitucional, Requisitos formales para la procedencia de solicitud de aclaración.
Se niega solicitud de aclaración por improcedente por ausencia de ambigüedades, confusión o duda
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. NEGAR POR IMPROCEDENTE la solicitud de aclaracion de la sentencia C-767 de 2014, formulada por el Ministerio del Trabajo.
- SEGUNDO. Comuniquese la presente providencia a la parte interesada, informandosele que contra la misma no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.