JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 20, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Carlos Mario Izasa Serrano

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto De Agosto 22 De 2006, Que Rechazó Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad. Confirma El Auto De Rechazo De La Demanda.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Absoluta
  • Funciones jurisdiccionales del Procurador General de la Nación
  • Presunción de control integral
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Confirmar el auto de auto de agosto veintidos (22) de 2006, mediante el cual el Magistrado sustanciador Nilson Pinilla Pinilla resolvio rechazar la demanda interpuesta por Carlos Mario Isaza Serrano contra el inciso
  2. tercero. del articulo 148 de la Ley 734 de 2002 "por la cual se adopta el Codigo Disciplinario Unico".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.