JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 14, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Lydia Teresa Gonzalez Garnica·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Consulta Sobre El Alcance Del Articulo 1 De La Ley 1148/07
  • Improcedencia
  • Con ocasión a la sentencia C-903/08
Sentencias De La Corte Constitucional
  • Contra estas providencias no procede recurso alguno
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Corte Constitucional decide RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud impetrada por la memorialista, con la cual pretendía que la Corporación brindara concepto respecto al alcance del artículo 1º de la Ley 1148 de 2007, con ocasión de la expedición de la sentencia C-903/12.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud invocada por la ciudadana Lydia Teresa Gonzalez Garnica, mediante la cual pretende que la Corte Constitucional brinde un concepto sobre el alcance del articulo 1deg de la Ley 1148 de 2007, con ocasion de la expedicion de la sentencia C-903 de 2008.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.