JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 6, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Laborde Rubio

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto De Agosto 4 De 2006 Proferido Por La Magistrada Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez De Rechazo De La Demanda. Los Cargos De La Demanda No Cumplen Las Exigencias Basicas De Claridad, Certeza, Especificidad, Pertinencia Y Suficiencia. Confirma El Auto De Rechazo
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Alcance del requisito de suficiencia
  • Alcance de la carga de especificidad
  • Cumplimiento del requisito de suficiencia
Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Incumplimiento de requisitos de especificidad y suficiencia
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional en ejercicio de sus facultades constitucionales y legales,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Confirmar el auto de agosto 4 de 2006, mediante el cual la Magistrada Sustanciadora Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez resolvio rechazar la demanda interpuesta por Ramon Esteban Laborde Rubio contra el articulo 83 de la Ley 715 de 2001.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
DissentJaime Araujo RenteríaDissentClara Ines Vargas HernandezDissentHumberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.