JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 2, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Robison Antonio Bueno Mejia

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Celeridad
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • La peticionaria no tiene por que sufrir la mora en los términos sobre interpretación de normas de competencia para conocer de la acción de tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
Corte Constitucional
  • Conocimiento directo de conflicto de competencia para evitar dilaciones injustificadas y proteger derechos fundamentales
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente de tutela al Juzgado 14 Civil Municipal de Medellín para que adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial, lo anterior, teniendo en cuenta que un factor determinante de la competencia en materia de tutela es el territorial, según el Art. 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991 y el Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (20 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente de tutela al Juzgado 14 Civil Municipal de Medellin, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
  3. Presidente
  4. JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
  5. Magistrado
  6. ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
  7. Magistrado
  8. MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  9. Magistrado
  10. JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
  11. Magistrado
  12. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  13. Magistrado
  14. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  15. Magistrado
  16. EDUARDO MONTEALEGRE LYNETT
  17. Magistrado
  18. ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
  19. Magistrado
  20. IVAN HUMBERTO ESCRUCERIA MAYOLO
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Reporting justice
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Magistrado
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Magistrado
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Presidente
✓
Eduardo Montealegre Lynett
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 4cited by 2 →A. 223/03A. 044/98 — Conflicto De Competencias · cited 190 timesA. 044/981998T-063/01 — Debido Proceso. Prohibicion De La Reformatio In Pejus. Jueces De Tutela. Competencia A Prevencion Por Razon Del Factor Territorial. Via De H · cited 31 timesT-063/012001T-883/00 — Debido Proceso. Derecho Al Minimo Vital Y Defensa. Motivacion Del Acto Adtivo Que Dispone La Desvinculacion De Funcionarios En Interinidad. · cited 28 timesT-883/002000A. 051/03 — Conflicto De Competencia · cited 11 timesA. 051/032003T-772/10 · cited 26 timesT-772/102010A. 043/04 — Conflicto De CompetenciaA. 043/042004
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites4
Cited by2

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.