JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 28, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Rafael Andrade Barrios

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional Y Principio De Intangibilidad
  • Procedencia excepcional supeditada a duda que impida su entendimiento
Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Reiteración de improcedencia
  • Procedencia por presentación dentro del término de ejecutoria
  • Declaración de inexequibilidad en sentencia C-113/93
  • Procedencia respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional del artículo 285 del Código General del Proceso
Accion De Tutela Contra Alcaldia En Materia De Proyecto De Vivienda Social
  • Negar solicitud de aclaración de sentencia T-109/15
4 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T-620/13.

La Sala de Revisión decide RECHAZAR la petición presentada, por haber sido presentada de manera extemporánea.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Sexta de Revision de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. RECHAZAR por extemporanea la solicitud de fecha 17 de abril de 2015, formulada por el senor Rafael Andrade Barrios.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.