JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 16, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Ladrillera Cepetrecol Ltda.

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Salas de la Corte Suprema de Justicia
  • Aplicación de normas generales
  • Conocimiento para resolverlo debe ser expreso
Corte Constitucional
  • Inaplicación del precepto constitucional
  • No puede arrogarse competencias para llenar vacíos legislativos
  • Organo aplicador de la Constitución
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Dirime conflictos de competencia entre distintas jurisdicciones
Estado Social De Derecho
  • Posición jurídica del individuo o del funcionario público
11 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se Inhibió por carecer de competencia de resolver el conflicto suscitado entre las Salas de Casación Penal y Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para conocer de la acción de tutela promovida por la empresa de referencia.

En consecuencia, se ordenó remitir el expediente a la Sala Plena de la Corte Suprema de Justicia para lo de su competencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Inhibirse, por carecer de competencia, de resolver el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre las Salas de Casacion Penal y Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para conocer de la accion de tutela promovida por la Ladrillera Cepretecol Ltda. en contra de la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Bogota.
  2. Segundo. Remitir el expediente a la Sala Plena de la Corte Suprema de Justicia para lo de su competencia y comunicar lo aqui decidido a la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.