JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 17, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Jose Leonardo Bueno Rojas Y Otros Vs. Fondo Nacional De Prestaciones Sociales Del Magisterio

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Veintitrés Civil Del Circuito De Bogota Y El Juzgado Diecisiete Penal Municipal De Bogota. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Contentivo De La Accion De Tutela Al Juzgado Veintitrés Civil Del Circuito De Bogota
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional a pesar de existir superior jerárquico común
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional para garantizar derechos fundamentales
Fiduciaria La Previsora
  • Naturaleza jurídica
Accion De Tutela Contra Fondo Nacional Del Ahorro
  • Competencia por juez del circuito o con categoría de tales
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Conocimiento por jueces de circuito o con categoría de tales
Fondo Nacional De Prestaciones Sociales Del Magisterio
  • Carácter jurídico y composición directiva
6 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por los ciudadanos Jose Leonardo Bueno Rojas y Ana Maria Ramirez de Bueno, al Juzgado veintitres (23) Civil del Circuito de Bogota, para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.