A- de 2003
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett
✓Claimant Maria Ximena Castilla Jimenez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Trámite
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se declaró que no es pertinente la recusación formulada por la ciudadana de la referencia contra los magistrados de la Corte para conocer de la nulidad planteada por algunos ciudadanos contra la sentencia C-551/03.
De conformidad con lo anterior, es a la Sala Plena de la Corte a quien le compete pronunciarse respecto a las solicitudes de nulidad que puedan ser planteadas.
Por tanto, mal podría relevarse a sí misma de una obligación impuesta por el ordenamiento jurídico.
Ello refuerza entonces la impertinencia de la causal de recusación invocada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
- RESUELVE
- Primero. DECLARAR que no es pertinente la recusacion formulada por la ciudadana Maria Ximena Castilla Jimenez contra los magistrados de la Corte para conocer de la nulidad planteada por algunos ciudadanos contra la sentencia C-551 de 2003.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.