JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 28, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Albeto Caicedo Rojas

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto Del 24 De Mayo De 2005 De Rechazo De La Demanda. Confirma El Auto Del 24 De Mayo De 2005 Proferido Por El Magistrado Manuel Jose Cepeda Espinosa Que Rechazo La Demanda Contra El Articulo 69 Parcial Del Codigo Procesal Del Trabajo
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia por no formulación de argumentos
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. CONFIRMAR el Auto del 24 de mayo de 2005, proferido por el Magistrado Manuel Jose Cepeda Espinosa, que rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Alberto Caicedo Rojas contra el articulo 69 parcial del Codigo Procesal del Trabajo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.