JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 16, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Martha Esperanza Ordoñez Vera

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el Auto del 14 de mayo de 2010, dictado por el Magistrado Juan Carlos Henao Pérez, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda presentada contra el artículo 262 del Código Civil.

La Corte encuentra que frente a la expresión acusada por la accionante ha operado el fenómeno de cosa juzgada, por lo tanto se procede a confirmar el auto que rechazó la demanda, por el cargo relacionado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el Auto de 14 de mayo de 2010 dictado por el Magistrado Sustanciador, Juan Carlos Henao Perez, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad, identificada con el numero de radicacion D- 8108, presentada por la ciudadana Martha Esperanza Ordonez Vera, contra la expresion "sancionarlos moderadamente", contenida en el articulo 262 del Codigo Civil, por las consideraciones expuestas en la presente providencia.
  2. Notifiquese, cumplase, archivese el expediente e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.