JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 4, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Ricaurte Mosquera Urrutia

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Civil Del Circuito De Quibdo Y El Juzgado Noveno Civil Del Circuito De Bogota. Ordena Al Juzgado Civil Del Circuito De Quibdo Que Asuma El Conocimiento De La Accion De Tutela
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional para garantizar derechos fundamentales
  • Función residual de la Corte Constitucional
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
Competencia A Prevención En Tutela
  • Factor territorial y subjetivo
  • Aplicación
Accion De Tutela Contra Caja Nacional De Prevision Social
  • Conocimiento por jueces del circuito o con categoría de tales
Corte Constitucional
  • Conocimiento directo de conflicto de competencia para evitar dilaciones injustificadas y proteger derechos fundamentales
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Reglas fijadas determinan autoridad judicial a asumir
5 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ORDENAR al Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Quibdo (Choco), que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la accion de tutela de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.