JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 12, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto De Rechazo De La Demanda D-2371.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se confirmó en todas sus partes el auto de la referencia proferido por esta Corte, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda presentada por el accionante en el presente proceso contra el Art. 67 del Decreto 132 de 1995.

Lo anterior, porque el mencionado artículo objeto de este recurso de súplica, fue demandado íntegramente y esta Corporación adelantó el análisis constitucional de toda la expresión normativa y la encontró ajustada a la Carta Fundamental, lo que obliga a concluir que sobre el citado artículo operó el fenómeno de la cosa juzgada constitucional absoluta y no es viable, por lo tanto, que la Corte regrese a ella para revisarla.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E :
  2. CONFIRMAR, en todas sus partes el auto de 16 de abril de 1999, proferido por el despacho del Magistrado Alejandro Martínez Caballero, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda presentada por el ciudadano MIGUEL ARCANGEL VILLALOBOS CHAVARRO, contra el artículo 67 del decreto 132 de 1995.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.