JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 24, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Aurelio Ignacio Cadavid Lopez

✓
Topic · hard data
Tramite De Incidentes De Nulidad De La Sentencia C-355 De 2006. Recurso De Reposicion Contra El Auto 360 De 2006 Que Nego La Nulidad De La Sentencia C-355 De 2006. En El Auto 360 De 2006 Se Indico Por La Corte Que Lo Expuesto Por Los Magistrados En El Respectivo Salvamento De Voto No Da Lugar A La Declaratoria De Nulidad De La Sentencia C-355 De 2006. Rechaza El Recurso De Reposicion Interpuesto
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • No constituye vicio de nulidad, el hecho de que quien actuó como ponente de la decisión atacada de nulidad sea el mismo de la providencia que resuelve sobre la nulidad de la misma
4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Rechazar el recurso de reposicion interpuesto por el ciudadano Aurelio Ignacio Cadavid Lopez, contra el Auto 360 de seis de diciembre de 2006.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.