JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 21, 1994

A- de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Villa Idarraga Gloria Soley

✓
Topic · hard data
Integracion Del Contradictorio En El Proceso De Tutela. Improcedencia De Sentencia Inhibitoria En Tutela.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se revoca el fallo proferido por el Tribunal Administrativo y ordena al Juez del conocimiento que proceda a integrar el contradictorio para configurar la legitimación en la causa de la parte demandada.

La Corte expone que en la acción de tutela no pueden expedirse fallos inhibitorios y señala que mientras no se vincule debidamente a la parte demandada no es posible proferir sentencia de mérito, estimatoria o desestimatoria de las pretensiones de la demanda.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Segunda de Revision,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Revocar el fallo del 8 de marzo de 1994, proferido por el H. Tribunal Administrativo y ordenar que se proceda a integrar el contradictorio como se indica en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.