JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 10, 1999

A- de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez

✓Claimant Emilio Martinez Rosales

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaracion De La Sentencia C-740/98. Objecion Presidencial.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó por falta de competencia, la solicitud de aclaración formulada por el Presidente de la Cámara de Representantes en el asunto de la referencia, toda vez que la Corte Constitucional carece de competencia para aclarar sus sentencias, al tenor de lo dispuesto por el Art. 243 de la Carta Política, de acuerdo con el cual los fallos que la Corte dicte en ejercicio del control jurisdiccional hacen tránsito a cosa juzgada constitucional, por lo que no existe posibilidad de emitir un nuevo pronunciamiento respecto de lo resuelto por la Corporación.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. RECHAZAR por falta de competencia, la solicitud de aclaración formulada por el doctor Emilio Martínez Rosales, Presidente de la H. Cámara de Representantes en el asunto de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.