JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 22, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Juan Carlos Henao Pérez

✓Claimant Rigoberto Galvis Álvarez·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia de oficio y a solicitud de parte respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
Fallo De Revision De Tutela
  • Reiteración improcedencia de aclaración, corrección o adición
Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por cuanto parte considerativa no guarda relación con parte resolutiva y falta de legitimación
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T-1166 de 2008.

Se encuentra que el solicitante no hizo parte dentro del proceso, motivo por el cual no esta legitimado para presentar esta petición.

Se decide rechazar la petición formulada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud formulada por el ciudadano Rigoberto Galvis Alvarez para que se aclare la sentencia T-1166 de 2008.
  2. Segundo. Comuniquese la presente providencia al interesado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.