JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 5, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Pedro Augusto Morales Granados Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Correccion Error Mecanografico Sentencia T-1241/01
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se realizó la corrección del texto de las páginas 9 (Cuadro resumen de las pruebas recibidas por el despacho), 27 (punto 5.10 de los considerandos de la sentencia), 32 (Ordinal Décimo, parte resolutiva de la sentencia) y 37 (Cuadro resumen procesos acumulados CAR y Secretaría de Gobierno Distrital de Bogotá) de la Sentencia T-1241/01, y en consecuencia, donde dice: “Germán Carlos Agudelo Barbero”, debe decir “Germán Carlos Agudelo Barrero”.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto esta Sala de Revision
  2. RESUELVE
  3. PRIMERO. CORREGIR el texto de las paginas las paginas 9 (Cuadro resumen de las pruebas recibidas por el despacho), 27 (punto 5.10 de los considerandos de la sentencia), 32 (Ordinal Decimo, parte resolutiva de la sentencia) y 37 (Cuadro resumen procesos acumulados CAR y Secretaria de Gobierno Distrital de Bogota) de la Sentencia T-1241/01, y en consecuencia, donde dice: "German Carlos Agudelo Barbero", debe decir "German Carlos Agudelo Barrero"
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela