JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 20, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant José Fidolo López

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad De La Sentencia Su.805/03
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

No se declaró la nulidad de la Sentencia SU.805/03 proferida por esta Corporación, toda vez que no se vulneró el debido proceso y a la igualdad, pues, la fiduciaria de la referencia, como querellante legítimo, no instauró en su momento el proceso policivo de lanzamiento.

Dejó que en su lugar lo haga un tercero no legitimado para ello.

No obstante, pretende que se anule el fallo de tutela que impidió el lanzamiento ante la ilegitimidad del querellante.

Luego, lo que pretende es que se anule la sentencia de unificación para evitar los efectos de su propia omisión.

Y, desde luego, esa no es la teleología de esa institución excepcional que es la nulidad de los fallos proferidos por esta Corporación.

Contra esta decisión no procede recurso alguno.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. No declarar la nulidad de la Sentencia SU-805-03 proferida por esta Corporación.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta decisión no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.