JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 16, 1999

T-910 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Angel Maria Roa Aragonez

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida. Der Al Minimo Vital Y Al Pago Oportuno De Mesadas Pensionales. Dpto Del Huila. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Departamento
  • Situación económica o presupuestal no es óbice para desconocer obligaciones laborales
Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
Derecho A La Vida Digna
  • Pago oportuno de mesadas pensionales
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la decisión proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Sexto. Civil Municipal de Neiva. En su lugar, TUTELAR los derechos fundamentales a la vida y al mínimo vital del señor Ángel María Roa Aragonez
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR al Departamento del Huila que en el plazo máximo de quince (15) días contados a partir de la notificación de la presente sentencia, pague las mesadas pensionales adeudadas al actor. Si no hubiere la disponibilidad correspondiente, dispondrá del término ya indicado para iniciar las gestiones tendientes a la consecución de los correspondientes recursos.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.