JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 26, 2007

T-789 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Jaime Ramirez Paz Vs. Ministerio De Hacienda Y Credito Publico Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por expedición de bono pensional
Bono Pensional
  • Liquidación con base en el salario efectivamente devengado y no el cotizado
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la seguridad social la vida la dignidad y la salud de persona a quien no le ha sido expedido ni pagado el bono pensional a que tiene derecho aduciendose que por cuanto el iss no ha reconocido la cuota parte del bono que le corresponde.solicita se ordene el reconocimiento de la cuota parte y la expedicion y pago del bono pensional.hecho superado por cuanto se reconocio el correspondiente bono.carencia actual de objeto

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Levantar la suspensión de términos decretada en el asunto de la referencia.
  2. Segundo. DECLARAR la carencia actual de objeto.
  3. Tercero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida el 24 de enero de 2006 por la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala Laboral, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  4. Cuarto. Líbrense las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Reporting justice
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Nilson Pinilla Pinilla
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 2cited by 0 →T-789/07T-147/06 · cited 64 timesT-147/062006C-734/05 — Facultades Extraordinarias-Exceso En El Ejercicio Y Desconocimiento Del Requisito De Precisión · cited 35 timesC-734/052005
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites2
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.