JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 4, 2003

T-767 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Armando Moreno Tascon Vs. Fogafin Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Vida Salud Y Seguridad Social. Solicitud Reintegro Al Cargo Y Prestacion Servicios Medicos. Terminacion Unilateral Contrato De Trabajo. Pago Prestaciones E Indemnizacion. Liquidacion De Entidad Publica Y Privada. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Suspensión de atención por parte de EPS por agotarse periodo de cubrimiento posterior a la desafiliación por despido
Reintegro
  • Improcedencia cuando la entidad pública o privada se encuentra en liquidación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Confirmase por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta sentencia, el fallo proferido por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota, dentro de la accion de tutela interpuesta pro el senor Armando Moreno Tascon contra el Fondo de Garantias de las Instituciones Financieras y la Financiera FES en liquidacion.
  2. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.