JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 14, 1993

T-586 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Ruby Naranjo

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Pension De Jubilacion. Caja Nal De Prevision. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Noveno. Laboral del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá, el día cinco (5) de agosto de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993), por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  3. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela por violación del Derecho fundamental de petición. En tal virtud se ordena a la CAJA NACIONAL DE PREVISION SOCIAL resolver la petición elevada por RUBY DOLLY NARANJO OSSA, dentro del término improrrogable de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contado a partir de la notificación de esta sentencia, si para la fecha de esta última no ha sido resuelta la solicitud.
  4. Tercero. LIBRENSE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991 para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.