JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 15, 2000

T-544 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Jose Benedicto Ramirez Canchon

✓
Topic · hard data
De. A La Seguridad Social. Obligacion Del Patrono De Afiliar A Sus Trabajadores A Una Entidad De Seguridad Social. Omision Del Trabajador En Allegar Documentos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Empleador
  • Asunción de responsabilidad por mora en aportes a seguridad social
Derecho A La Seguridad Social
  • Obligación de afiliar al trabajador
4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones aquí señaladas, el fallo de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Laboral, proferido el 24 de noviembre de 1999, al resolver sobre la acción de tutela incoada por José Benedicto Ramírez Canchón, contra Fernando Espitia Manrique, propietario del Restaurante "El Gran Sazón".
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría, LÍBRESE la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.