JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 10, 1993

T-518 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Sara Ballestas

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Silencio Administrativo. Sustitucion Pensional. Caja Nal. De Prevision. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, Sala Laboral, el ocho (8) de julio de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993), y en su lugar CONFIRMAR la proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Laboral del Circuito del veintidos (22) de junio de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993), por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia. En consecuencia, la CAJA NACIONAL DE PREVISION SOCIAL decidirá expresamente el recurso interpuesto por la accionante, dentro del término improrrogable de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contado a partir de la notificación de esta sentencia, si para la notificación de ésta última no ha sido resuelto el recurso y siempre que no se haya presentado la demanda correspondiente.
  3. SEGUNDO. LIBRENSE por secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el Artículo 36 del Decreto 2591, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.